Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 23 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 15 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.85 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |