Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 4 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 253 mm (10 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.65 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |