Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Porsche Cayenne 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 63 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Porsche Cayenne. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 253 mm (10 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 10 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 670 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1780 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.35 metres more than that of the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |