Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 28 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Wrangler is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2322 litres | 2091 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 231 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.15 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 2`880 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`980 kg | 2`165 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 715 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 36 procentiem less than Nissan Pathfinder. Therefore, Nissan Pathfinder is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |