Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 54 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Navara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Pathfinder 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Pathfinder 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 2091 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.35 metres more than that of the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |