Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Land Rover Discovery 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 68 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2322 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.85 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 3`240 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |