Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs BMW X5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 68 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 130 NM less than BMW X5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 253 mm (10 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1750 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.55 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
BMW X5 has
| |