Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Audi Q5 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 63 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Audi Q5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 253 mm (10 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4, Audi A5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.65 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1560 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.65 metres more than that of the Audi Q5, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |