Jeep Wrangler 2018 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 40 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 5.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 260 mm (10.2 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 25 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1110 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 294 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 602 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`404 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`920 kg | 1`728 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 484 kg | 472 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda CR-V scores higher in safety tests. The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |