Jeep Wrangler 2018 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 40 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 260 mm (10.2 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 25 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1110 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 294 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 602 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`404 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`920 kg | 1`728 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 484 kg | 472 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda CR-V scores higher in safety tests. The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 600 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |