Jeep Wrangler 2018 vs Land Rover Defender 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler and Land Rover Defender have the same engine power, but Jeep Wrangler torque is 20 NM more than Land Rover Defender. Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.8 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 260 mm (10.2 inches) | 291 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Defender can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.97 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 397 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1563 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 1055 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`404 kg | 2`970 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`920 kg | 2`156 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 484 kg | 814 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 68 procentiem less than Land Rover Defender. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Defender scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Defender scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 51 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |
