Jeep Wrangler 2018 vs Hyundai Kona 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 395 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Kona is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 4 HP less power than Hyundai Kona, but torque is 55 NM more than Hyundai Kona. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 14.7 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 17.40 € | 4.40 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Range per fill-up: | 830 km in combined cycle | no data | |
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 260 mm (10.2 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 13 cm longer than the Hyundai Kona, 8 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 30 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 332 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1114 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 606 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.1 metres less than that of the Hyundai Kona. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`404 kg | 2`170 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`920 kg | 1`685 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 484 kg | 485 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 600 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |