Jeep Wrangler 2018 vs BMW 3 series 2003
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 85 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 170 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.8 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2003 2.0 engine: The BMW M47D20TU is a 2.0-liter diesel engine generally regarded as a durable unit capable of covering more than 400,000 km with proper maintenance. It uses a timing chain drive positioned at the front of the engine, which simplifies servicing compared with some later BMW diesels. The fuel system and overall ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.41 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 15 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 14 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 46 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1345 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 232 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 837 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`404 kg | 2`005 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`920 kg | 1`510 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 484 kg | 495 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |