Jeep Wrangler 2021 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Jeep Wrangler) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Suzuki Grand Vitara) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 104 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.1 l/100km + 23.9 kWh/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 14.70 € | 16.80 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 274 mm (10.8 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 73 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 548 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1059 litres | 516 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Jeep Wrangler has 364 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 543 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`903 kg | 1`890 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`334 kg | 1`536 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 569 kg | 354 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 38 procentiem more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Therefore, Jeep Wrangler is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 37 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |