Jeep Wrangler 2021 vs BMW 3 series 2003
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Jeep Wrangler) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (BMW 3 series), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 155 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 120 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.1 l/100km + 23.9 kWh/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 14.70 € | 12.60 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2003 2.0 engine: The BMW M47D20TU is a 2.0-liter diesel engine generally regarded as a durable unit capable of covering more than 400,000 km with proper maintenance. It uses a timing chain drive positioned at the front of the engine, which simplifies servicing compared with some later BMW diesels. The fuel system and overall ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 31 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 14 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 46 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 548 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1059 litres | 1345 litres | |
| Jeep Wrangler has 113 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 286 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`903 kg | 2`005 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`334 kg | 1`510 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 569 kg | 495 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than BMW 3 series. Therefore, Jeep Wrangler is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 37 400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |