Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 37 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.7 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 252 mm (9.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 27 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Wrangler has 571 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1003 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |