Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Wrangler) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 246 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 37 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 204 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 11.7 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Wrangler is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Wrangler has 88 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 45 600 | 59 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |