Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Wrangler) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Suzuki Grand Vitara) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 34 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 225 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.2 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 252 mm (9.9 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 82 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 516 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Jeep Wrangler has 349 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 528 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 46 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |