Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Audi Q7 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Wrangler) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Audi Q7) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 52 HP less power than Audi Q7, but torque is 80 NM more than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.3 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 17 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 533 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1955 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 911 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q7. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q7 scores higher in safety tests. The Audi Q7 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 48 200 | 34 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q7 has
| |