Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 23 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jeep Wrangler has 17 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 833 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 48 200 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |