Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs BMW 3 series 2003
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 85 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 170 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.8 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 40 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 14 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 46 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1345 litres | |
| Jeep Wrangler has 98 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 301 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |