Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 83 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.4 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 274 mm (10.8 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 548 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1059 litres | 1934 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 73 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 875 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`765 kg | 2`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`205 kg | 2`165 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 825 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 47 procentiem less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 800 | 44 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |