Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Toyota Hilux 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 83 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Toyota Hilux. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.0 | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Hilux might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Hilux 2015 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Hilux 2015 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 55 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 898 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Hilux scores higher in safety tests. The Jeep Wrangler scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 46 400 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |