Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs BMW X5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 140 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 160 NM less than BMW X5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.2 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 274 mm (10.8 inches) | 214 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6, BMW X7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 14 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 898 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 253 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW X5 scores higher in safety tests. The BMW X5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 49 400 | 60 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
BMW X5 has
| |