Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 110 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 227 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 11.7 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 18 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 898 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 2047 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jeep Wrangler has 206 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 3 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |