Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 13 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 898 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 116 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The Jeep Grand Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 496 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 47 000 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |