Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 40 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 898 litres | 673 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 225 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. The Land Rover Range Rover Velar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Velar scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 47 000 | 39 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |