Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 46 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 898 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 118 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. The Land Rover Range Rover Sport may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 48 200 | 65 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |