Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs BMW X4 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 70 HP more power than BMW X4, whereas torque is 200 NM more than BMW X4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 5.6 | |
|
The BMW X4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.62 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 3 cm longer than the BMW X4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 898 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 1430 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Jeep Wrangler has 373 litres more trunk space than the BMW X4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 620 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 48 200 | 37 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
BMW X4 has
| |