Jeep Wrangler 2003 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.5 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2000 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 25 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 358 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 864 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |