Jeep Wrangler 2003 vs Subaru Forester 2005

 
Jeep Wrangler
2003 - 2006
Subaru Forester
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 147 HP230 HP
Torque: 224 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds7.6 seconds
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving.
Jeep Wrangler engine produces 83 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.410.5
Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 3.95 m4.48 m
Width: 1.68 m1.74 m
Height: 1.75 m1.58 m
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher.
Jeep Wrangler is 53 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 17 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres387 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1045 litresno data
Subaru Forester has more luggage space.
Jeep Wrangler has 67 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 98003600
Pros and Cons: Jeep Wrangler has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Subaru Forester has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv