Jeep Wrangler 2003 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 47 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 16 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.6 | |
| Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 31 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |