Jeep Wrangler 2003 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 32 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 16 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 35 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |