Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Opel Mokka 2012

 
Jeep Wrangler
2012 - 2017
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.8 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 200 HP130 HP
Torque: 410 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.4 seconds
Jeep Wrangler engine produces 70 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Opel Mokka. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.85.1
Real fuel consumption: 11.0 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 555 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 3.88 m4.28 m
Width: 1.87 m1.78 m
Height: 1.80 m1.66 m
Jeep Wrangler is 40 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 14 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 486 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1372 litres
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 130 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The Opel Mokka may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`5851`959
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 25 2007800
Pros and Cons: Jeep Wrangler has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Opel Mokka has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv