Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 30 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 50 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 32 000 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |