Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 18 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 87 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 492 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`585 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |