Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Porsche Macan 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Porsche Macan is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 45 HP less power than Porsche Macan, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Porsche Macan. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.9 | |
|
The Porsche Macan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Macan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 80 cm shorter than the Porsche Macan, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Jeep Wrangler has 14 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Macan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | 2`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 38 000 | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Porsche Macan has
| |