Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 50 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 41 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 67 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |