Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Mini Countryman 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 88 HP more power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mini Countryman. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.0 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.56 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 22 cm shorter than the Mini Countryman, 8 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1170 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 136 litres more trunk space than the Mini Countryman. The Mini Countryman may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | 1`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |