Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 10 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 48 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 89 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 000 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |