Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Hyundai ix35 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 16 HP more power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Hyundai ix35. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix35 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.67 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 53 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 105 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |