Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs BMW X4 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 10 HP more power than BMW X4, whereas torque is 10 NM more than BMW X4. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 540 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 79 cm shorter than the BMW X4, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
| Jeep Wrangler has 14 litres less trunk space than the BMW X4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | 2`335 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 38 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
BMW X4 has
| |