Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 45 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 75 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 54 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | 2`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 38 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |