Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Audi Q3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 23 HP more power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Audi Q3. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.61 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 50 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 26 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 32 000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |