Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 285 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 342 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 127 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 144 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 630 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.72 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 48 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 100 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |