Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 285 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 342 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 87 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 13.1 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 73 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 618 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 38 000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |