Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 285 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 342 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 145 HP more power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 142 NM more than Chevrolet Trax. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.4 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 795 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2012 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.67 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 37 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Trax, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 356 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 130 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. The Chevrolet Trax may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 1`884 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |