Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 285 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 80 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 11.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.2 l/100km | 15.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 480 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler Pacifica | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.74 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 25 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 897 litres | 878 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 19 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 58 400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |