Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 155 HP more power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 705 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen T-Roc gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler and Volkswagen T-Roc are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 242 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 782 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`780 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 39 600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |