Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 154 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 215 NM more than Toyota C-HR. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 585 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.56 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 8 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 31 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota C-HR has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 174 litres less trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`865 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 600 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |