Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 120 HP more power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 16 cm shorter than the Jaguar E-Pace, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 897 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 337 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 527 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.96 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar E-Pace scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 58 400 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |